Advertisement

Ask Ellen: TLC Through PLCs

Professional learning communities enhance knowledge and teamwork.

by Ellen Moir

Print Forward Share Comments(4) Comment RSS

Dear Ellen,

It seems as if everybody in education is talking about professional learning communities. How do you define PLCs, and how important do you think PLCs are to the future of education?

Delia

Dear Delia,

It does seem that the phrase "professional learning community" is on every educator's lips these days. Fortunately, this is one educational trend that has tremendous merit. Our challenge is to implement PLCs in a meaningful, rigorous way, and to ensure that they become deeply rooted in our school cultures. Trusting teachers' professional judgment is at the heart of professional learning communities.

In 1997, Shirley Hord and her colleagues at the Southwest Educational Development Laboratory published a study that outlined the characteristics common to effective teacher PLCs. A precondition for the implementation of effective communities is capacity building; teachers need some basic training in PLC processes and protocols, and they need regular time to participate in PLC activities.

Ellen MoirCredit: Bart Nagel

Effective PLCs are characterized by shared leadership; principals may participate in teacher PLCs, but teachers run the show. PLCs focus on student learning in concrete terms; they are more likely to be analyzing student work than reading academic articles. PLCs also concentrate on specific issues of daily teaching practice. Finally, and most importantly, Hord found that effective PLCs are characterized by "visitation and review of each teacher's classroom behaviors, and results by peers, with feedback directed at individual and community improvement." The bottom line: In effective PLCs, every professional shares his or her results and opens his or her classroom to peers.

A lot of schools claim to be implementing PLCs but never quite achieve the level of deprivatization of professional practice Hord describes. These are the schools that will look back on PLCs a few years from now as another educational fad that came and went. On the other hand, schools that are pushing through the discomfort that comes with sharing individual results and practice are experiencing important shifts in school culture and student outcomes that will endure.

The organization that I direct has helped schools build PLCs for teachers and school leaders in a variety of settings. In the process, we have been documenting case studies of schools and districts that have used PLCs as the foundation of major school-improvement efforts.

In Springfield, Illinois, grade level and/or subject-matter teams are meeting daily to plan and evaluate lessons, review student work and formative assessment results, and share individual feedback based on regular peer visitations. In Oak Grove, California, every teacher and administrator analyzes and takes responsibility for instruction by deeply understanding the program and progress of "focal students" -- three to five at-risk pupils -- in a system designed to make the school-improvement process more concrete and specific.

Here, "deprivatization of practice" is a mantra, as everyone, from the superintendent to the newest teacher to the head of maintenance, is expected to be forthcoming in sharing results and in soliciting feedback and advice. Districts like Springfield and Oak Grove are producing encouraging results and are transforming district and school cultures.

Delia, I applaud your interest in professional learning communities. Building a PLC at your own school is not rocket science. You don't need expensive outside consultants or years of study. What it takes is having the understanding and vision that we are all professionals and learners, and that our job is to support and assist everyone in moving forward.

I encourage you to seek out some of the many good resources that are out there to help you and your staff learn the simple protocols and systems that schools adopt in support of PLCs, and advise you and your staff to identify, visit, and observe a few schools that have implemented powerful PLCs.

Sincerely,

Ellen Moir


Ellen Moir is a veteran bilingual teacher who is focused on the challenges faced by new teachers as well as on the needs of those with long careers in education. She is also the executive director of the New Teacher Center, at the University of California at Santa Cruz, a resource for educator-induction research, policy, and practice.

This article was also published in the June 2008 issue of Edutopia magazine.


Tinkering toward togetherness--PLCs are just a fad

Submitted by Dan Bruno (not verified) on August 19, 2008 - 20:01.

PLCs are just a fad and nothing more. The reason they are a fad has little to do with the "merit" they possess. As with most educational reforms of the past 100 years, PLCs promise new success in educational practice while giving a catchy title to something that is already a professional duty of teachers worldwide. Teachers should be learners. Teachers should collaborate. Teachers should discuss students' work as well as academic articles about their profession. These are all things that teachers should already be actively engaged in doing; however, now we have an acronym and a vague model that rarely turns out as described here and we certify it as a reform. Perhaps we should have PLCs about the overly general, non-specific reforms that do nothing but label professional behaviors teachers should already be engaged in as groups. Maybe then we could see how this reform, and others like it, do nothing but tinker with our existing structures in meaningless ways with an end result of zero change to the superstructure of education.

If you want a real reform, how about sutting back some of the less "professional" duties teachers have (and most public school teachers know what I mean) and allow time for group meetings whether departmentally or grade-level wise. Let teachers have actual time to discuss things amongst one another and you might be surprised how much change would be created. Otherwise, all you do is construct a framework creating processes out of what should be free and simple communication; however, that might allow teachers more power than most administrative teams (principals to superintendents) may be willing to give. After all, the government should be afraid of its people and our local school governments are not nearly afraid enough of what their teachers can do in the name of our students.

Professional Learning Communities

Submitted by Nathan (Massachusetts) (not verified) on August 15, 2008 - 06:22.

Unfortunately, Professional Learning Communities in most schools are not the bottom up activities that most teachers would like. They tend to be directed from above for example being assigned a SMART goal or having administrator-types sit in on all PLC meetings giving teachers the feeling they cannot be trusted, or creating arbitrary PLC groups of teachers that have little in common. We instituted PLCs last year in my school, I actually collaborated less last year b/c all our time was spent on protocols and no time spent on our real work…collaborating to provide the best education for our students.

Professional learning communities

Submitted by Annette (not verified) on July 1, 2008 - 23:11.

Recent literature on professional learning communities recommend the inclusion of all members of staff and possibly even parents. How do communities then ensure they remain professional?

Professional learning communities

Submitted by Nancy Reynolds (not verified) on June 19, 2008 - 07:42.

Thank you for featuring Shirley Hord's work on professional learning communities in your Ask Ellen column. Please note that Shirley Hord was at Southwest Educational Development Laboratory (now called SEDL) and not Southwest Educational Lab as mentioned in your article when she and colleagues published early studies on professional learning communities. See http://www.sedl.org/pubs/catalog/items/change67.html for information on a new PLC book by Shirley Hord and William Sommers and a list of other SEDL publications on PLCs.

Nancy Reynolds
Information Associate
SEDL
Information Resource Center
4700 Mueller Blvd.
Austin, TX 78723
512-391-6548 (voice)
512-476-2286 (fax)
nancy.reynolds@sedl.org

Post new comment

Share your thoughts on this story. Please increase the credibility of your post by including your name and city, and by demonstrating respect for others' opinions. Comments will not appear immediately; all comments are moderated and will be posted in order of submission.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options